Friday, January 25, 2013
On Haiti
CEPR has been following the post-earthquake "reconstruction" in Haiti for years, even when others had moved on to other places. They've been active, for instance, in reporting the UN-sponsored introduction of cholera to the country, and the resulting (further) immiseration. With the publication of the US State Department report to Congress (which doesn't even mention cholera), we find that the US has exported its housing priorities to that country as well. While hundreds of thousands still live in tents, the report notes that a few more than 1,000 units have been planned for Haitians. But the US has constructed 107 really nice homes (three to five bedrooms!) for US Embassy personnel, along with swimming pools and other sports facilities. Gee, maybe Governor Brown is advising on the issue.
Thursday, January 24, 2013
Still Poorer Sacramento Gives Up All Semblance of Dignity
The sale of the Sacramento Kings to the Hansen group is a done deal. Hansen has to pay $30 million to the Maloof group on February 1, sort of a deposit to insure everyone's good behavior. It now appears that the Maloofs' flirtation with Virginia Beach may have been a strategy to get the Hansen group to up its offer. But is Sacramento accepting its fate with grace and dignity? Noooo.
First, the Mayor, who was once a point guard for the Phoenix Suns and thinks that Sacramento has "world class" city potential, has embarked on a quixotic quest to raise the money to meet the Hansen group' offer. But it ain't gonna happen. First, the Hansen offer is very good. It bails out the Maloofs, and gives them a handsome nest egg for their next failed venture. It also (and here's where the NBA comes in) moves the team to a better market and insures that Seattle doesn't lose any money on its contribution to the arena.
You see, the residents of Seattle aren't any happier than Californians at the thought of subsidizing a bunch of really, really rich guys and their toys. So they passed Initiative 91, which prohibits city investment in any arena that doesn't guarantee a profit for the city. So the Hansen group has agreed to insure that the surcharge revenue that will pay off the $200 million in bonds will be sufficient. If it isn't, the Hansen group will make up the difference.
In Sacramento there are two problems with arena construction. The first is that we'd have to raise at least $250 million, and doing that is questionable. The original proposal was to sell off our parking revenue, but it turned out that we might only raise $160-180 million from that. Then it was discovered that selling off parking revenue was a really bad idea, in that the people to whom it was sold could have their way with parking fees. The second is that our City Manager is already whining about Sacramento's debt, both from bonds and retiree health care. It's not going to go over well when the City Council contemplates ending retiree medical benefits and takes on another $250 million for an arena.
We have learned that David Stern is not a decent sort. He, having apparently urged the sale to the Hansen group, hasn't had the decency to tell Mayor Johnson that it's a done deal, over, finished. And so Sacramento continues its humiliation by a score of cuts--the Mayor's pathetic maneuvers, Senator Darrell Steinberg's letter demanding to know how much the state is paying Microsoft (Steve Ballmer is a member of the Hansen group), and who knows what next.
We're moving back to the Bay Area, but I still hate to see the community where I spent my youth give up every shred of dignity to the NBA.
First, the Mayor, who was once a point guard for the Phoenix Suns and thinks that Sacramento has "world class" city potential, has embarked on a quixotic quest to raise the money to meet the Hansen group' offer. But it ain't gonna happen. First, the Hansen offer is very good. It bails out the Maloofs, and gives them a handsome nest egg for their next failed venture. It also (and here's where the NBA comes in) moves the team to a better market and insures that Seattle doesn't lose any money on its contribution to the arena.
You see, the residents of Seattle aren't any happier than Californians at the thought of subsidizing a bunch of really, really rich guys and their toys. So they passed Initiative 91, which prohibits city investment in any arena that doesn't guarantee a profit for the city. So the Hansen group has agreed to insure that the surcharge revenue that will pay off the $200 million in bonds will be sufficient. If it isn't, the Hansen group will make up the difference.
In Sacramento there are two problems with arena construction. The first is that we'd have to raise at least $250 million, and doing that is questionable. The original proposal was to sell off our parking revenue, but it turned out that we might only raise $160-180 million from that. Then it was discovered that selling off parking revenue was a really bad idea, in that the people to whom it was sold could have their way with parking fees. The second is that our City Manager is already whining about Sacramento's debt, both from bonds and retiree health care. It's not going to go over well when the City Council contemplates ending retiree medical benefits and takes on another $250 million for an arena.
We have learned that David Stern is not a decent sort. He, having apparently urged the sale to the Hansen group, hasn't had the decency to tell Mayor Johnson that it's a done deal, over, finished. And so Sacramento continues its humiliation by a score of cuts--the Mayor's pathetic maneuvers, Senator Darrell Steinberg's letter demanding to know how much the state is paying Microsoft (Steve Ballmer is a member of the Hansen group), and who knows what next.
We're moving back to the Bay Area, but I still hate to see the community where I spent my youth give up every shred of dignity to the NBA.
Monday, January 21, 2013
Eric Cantor Doesn't Like Poems Lauding Immigrants
Sunday, January 20, 2013
The Onion?
No, it's from the Wall Street Journal, where every family makes an income in six figures and the taxes are, you know, ruining their lives.
Saturday, January 19, 2013
Pontificating
Thomas Friedman is one of the most pretentious, self-important, irritating etc. pundits around. But now you can do just what he does! To do this, go to the column generator and produce your own Thomas Friedman column.
Thursday, January 17, 2013
Still Poorer Sacramento
Mayor Johnson and other city leaders are desperately trying to find investors to buy the Sacramento Kings and keep them from relocating to Seattle. They also want to float $250 million in bonds to build a new arena for the Kings and Monster Truck shows. Meanwhile in Seattle, the City Council has agreed to float $200 million in bonds for an arena for the relocated Kings.
I have no objection to rich guys buying themselves sports teams, if that's what they want to do with their money. I might suggest that we should be taxing them more if they have that much money to spend on their toys, but that's beside the point. But they never stop there. They always want the gummit to help them out by "investing" hundreds of millions in their projects.
Now in Sacramento that's particularly appalling, as our City Manager issued a report claiming that our present bond indebtedness is some $830 million. We need to add another $255 million to that? Worse than that, the City Council doesn't talk about reneging on the bond debt, but wants to cut out the retiree medical benefit, a subsidy of some $300 a month to retired city workers.
More than that, is this what the City Council should be doing? If they want to be entrepreneurs, that's fine, but they should raise their own money for their projects, instead of taking away retiree health care benefits. But they want to spend their time hanging out with the movers-and-shakers, all of whom seem to want a government subsidy.
In Seattle, a lawsuit has already been filed to stop that city from floating the bonds, as the repayment is to come from expected tax surcharges--revenue that may not be sufficient to pay off the bonds. Maybe Sacramento should pass something similar?
I have no objection to rich guys buying themselves sports teams, if that's what they want to do with their money. I might suggest that we should be taxing them more if they have that much money to spend on their toys, but that's beside the point. But they never stop there. They always want the gummit to help them out by "investing" hundreds of millions in their projects.
Now in Sacramento that's particularly appalling, as our City Manager issued a report claiming that our present bond indebtedness is some $830 million. We need to add another $255 million to that? Worse than that, the City Council doesn't talk about reneging on the bond debt, but wants to cut out the retiree medical benefit, a subsidy of some $300 a month to retired city workers.
More than that, is this what the City Council should be doing? If they want to be entrepreneurs, that's fine, but they should raise their own money for their projects, instead of taking away retiree health care benefits. But they want to spend their time hanging out with the movers-and-shakers, all of whom seem to want a government subsidy.
In Seattle, a lawsuit has already been filed to stop that city from floating the bonds, as the repayment is to come from expected tax surcharges--revenue that may not be sufficient to pay off the bonds. Maybe Sacramento should pass something similar?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
